Home > CSC-OpenAccess Library > Manuscript Information
EXPLORE PUBLICATIONS BY COUNTRIES |
EUROPE | |
MIDDLE EAST | |
ASIA | |
AFRICA | |
............................. | |
United States of America | |
United Kingdom | |
Canada | |
Australia | |
Italy | |
France | |
Brazil | |
Germany | |
Malaysia | |
Turkey | |
China | |
Taiwan | |
Japan | |
Saudi Arabia | |
Jordan | |
Egypt | |
United Arab Emirates | |
India | |
Nigeria |
An Ontological Meta-model for Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN)
Anna Lisa Guido, Pandurino Andrea, Roberto Paiano
Pages - 40 - 52 | Revised - 31-07-2016 | Published - 31-08-2016
MORE INFORMATION
KEYWORDS
BPMN, Ontology, Meta-model, Business Process, Knowledge Base.
ABSTRACT
Business processes are key aspect in the modern companies. Several tools to manage business process allow people to design, deploy and monitor business processes. The problem is that business processes are not part of the company knowledge but they are available only in the business process tool (if there are any) and/or in the mind of designer. In order to introduce the business process design in the overall company’s knowledge it is important to represent it in a formal way.
We select BPMN as notation to represent business process and we select ontology as a tool to represent in a machine readable format the business process and to make possible its definition in the company knowledge base.
In this paper we analyze the methodological steps that brings to the ontological meta-model of BPMN 2.0. We will present a detail of classes and properties that made up the ontological meta-model using OWL language. The characteristics of the obtained meta-model are completeness and extensibility. The use of ontological meta-model to represent the BPMN allow to add a semantic layer to the business process design (semantic annotation).
We select BPMN as notation to represent business process and we select ontology as a tool to represent in a machine readable format the business process and to make possible its definition in the company knowledge base.
In this paper we analyze the methodological steps that brings to the ontological meta-model of BPMN 2.0. We will present a detail of classes and properties that made up the ontological meta-model using OWL language. The characteristics of the obtained meta-model are completeness and extensibility. The use of ontological meta-model to represent the BPMN allow to add a semantic layer to the business process design (semantic annotation).
1 | Lubis, M., Lumingkewas, L. W., & Lubis, A. R. (2022). Business Process Re-Engineering: Strategies for Health Management Services in Puskesmas. In Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology (pp. 175-184). Springer, Singapore. |
2 | Reynares, E., Roa, J., Caliusco, M. L., & Villarreal, P. D. (2017, September). Formal Semantics for Modeling Collaborative Business Processes Based on Interaction Protocols. In International Conference on Business Process Management (pp. 770-781). Springer, Cham. |
C. Natschlager, “Towards a BPMN 2.0 ontology,” in Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 2011, pp. 1–15. | |
D. L. McGuinness and F. Van Harmelen. “OWL Web Ontology Language Overview,” W3C Recommendation, vol. 10, pp. 1–22, 2004. | |
D. Martin, M. Burstein, and J. Hobbs, “OWL-S: Semantic markup for web services". Internet: https://www.w3.org/Submission/OWL-S/”, Nov, 22, 2004 [June 10, 2016]. | |
H. M. Gholizadeh and M. A. Azgomi. “A meta-model based approach for definition of a multi-formalism modeling framework”. International Journal Computer Theory Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 87-95, 2010. | |
J. Prater, R. Mueller, and B. Beauregard, “An ontological approach to oracle BPM”. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2012, pp. 402–410. | |
M. Aslam, S. Auer, J. Shen, and M. Herrmann, “Expressing Business Process Models as OWL-S Ontologies,” In Business Process Management Workshops, vol. 4103, 2006, pp. 400–415. | |
M. Hepp, F. Leymann, J. Domingue, A. Wahler, and D. Fensel, “Semantic business process management: a vision towards using semantic Web services for business process management” In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. E-bus. Eng.,2005, no. 1, pp. 1–6. | |
M. Rospocher, C. Ghidini, and L. Serafini, “An ontology for the business process modelling notation,” in Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 2014, vol. 267, pp. 133–146. | |
N. F. Noy and D. L. McGuinness, “Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology,”. Internet http://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology101.pdf,.2001. [June 10, 2016]. | |
Object Management Group (OMG). (2006). Meta Object Facility ( MOF ) Core Specification. [On-line]. Available http://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/2.5 [June 10, 2016]. | |
Object Management Group (OMG). (2011, January). Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0. [On-line] 50. Available: http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/PDF [June 10, 2016]. | |
R. Paiano, A. L. Guido, A. Pandurino. Designing Complex Web Information Systems: Integrating Evolutionary Process Engineering: Integrating Evolutionary Process Engineering. IGI Global, 2009 pp. 390. | |
W. Abramowicz, A. Filipowska, M. Kaczmarek, and T. Kaczmarek, “Semantically enhanced Business Process Modelling Notation,” in Proc. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2007, pp. 1-4. | |
Mr. Anna Lisa Guido
University of Salento - Italy
annalisa.guido@unisalento.it
Mr. Pandurino Andrea
University of Salento - Department of Engineering for Innvoation - Italy
Mr. Roberto Paiano
Department of Engineering for Innovation - University of Salento - Italy
|
|
|
|
View all special issues >> | |
|
|