Home > CSC-OpenAccess Library > Manuscript Information
EXPLORE PUBLICATIONS BY COUNTRIES |
EUROPE | |
MIDDLE EAST | |
ASIA | |
AFRICA | |
............................. | |
United States of America | |
United Kingdom | |
Canada | |
Australia | |
Italy | |
France | |
Brazil | |
Germany | |
Malaysia | |
Turkey | |
China | |
Taiwan | |
Japan | |
Saudi Arabia | |
Jordan | |
Egypt | |
United Arab Emirates | |
India | |
Nigeria |
Attitude Formation of Benefits Satisfaction: Knowledge and Fit of Benefits
Gery Markova, Foard Jones
Pages - 45 - 52 | Revised - 31-03-2011 | Published - 04-04-2011
MORE INFORMATION
KEYWORDS
Benefits, Benefits Satisfaction, Turnover Intentions
ABSTRACT
Using the theoretical framework of the Theory of Reasoned Action [6], we examine benefits satisfaction as an attitude formed by the beliefs about benefits (i.e., benefits knowledge) and the perceived value of these benefits (i.e., fit of benefits to individual needs). We use questionnaires to gather data from a random sample of 591 employees in a large county agency in the South-eastern United States. The data support that knowledge of benefits is associated with enhanced benefits satisfaction and mediates the effect of explanations about benefits on satisfaction. The results provide strong evidence that benefits perceived to suit employee needs generate highest benefits satisfaction. Employees satisfied with their benefits are less likely to consider leaving the organization. The tested model is a starting point for future studies to apply the extended Theory of Reasoned Action [1] and incorporate perceived behavioural control and subjective norms (i.e., co-workers’ attitudes) in forming benefits satisfaction. Understanding employees’ affective and cognitive reactions to compensation, including benefits, can render better practices. Companies should use information campaigns to improve employee beliefs about benefits. Better attentiveness to individual needs and preferences can maximize the utility of a benefits plan and improve its acceptance. We replicate and extend past research in a parsimonious model of benefits satisfaction with a random sample of public sector employees.
1 | Punjani, K. K., & Mahadevan, K. (2021). Transitioning to online learning in higher education: Influence of Awareness of COVID-19 and Self-Efficacy on Perceived Net Benefits and Intention. Education and Information Technologies, 1-30. |
2 | Cristofaro, M., Giardino, P. L., & Leoni, L. (2021). Back to the Future: A Review and Editorial Agenda of the International Journal of Business Research and Management. International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), 12(1), 16-33. |
3 | Perrault, E. K., & Hildenbrand, G. M. (2019). Breaking Down Benefits: Employee Understanding of Benefits and Readability Levels of University Benefits Handbooks. Compensation & Benefits Review, 51(1), 13-26. |
4 | Van Geert, J. A. G. (2019). Employee benefits: a qualitative research study on the perceptions of HR-professionals with a strategic point of view on the use of flexibility, communication and employee involvement (Doctoral dissertation). |
5 | Khatak, I. (2017). Effect Of Total Compensation On Pay Satisfaction In Telenor Company Pakistan. VFAST Transactions on Education and Social Sciences, 5(1), 68-76. |
6 | Chagonda, T. (2016). Understanding the ascendancy of Short Message Service advertising in response rates of South African consumers (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Town). |
7 | Resurreccion, P. F. (2012). Performance management and compensation as drivers of organization competitiveness: The Philippine perspective. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(21). |
8 | Zieres, G. (2011). Change Management durch das Excellence-Modell im Gesundheitswesen: der MDK Rheinland-Pfalz als Referenzobjekt in der Gesundheitswirtschaft. |
A. Barber, R.B. Dunham and R.A. Formisano. “The impact of flexible benefits on employee satisfaction: A field study”. Personnel Psychology, 45(1): 55-75, 1992 | |
A. Brief, J. Atieh. “Studying job stress: Are we making mountains out of molehills?”. Journal of occupational behavior, 8(2): 115-126. 1987 | |
Ajzen. “The theory of planned behaviour”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2): 179-211, 1991 | |
B.R. Rabin. “Benefits communication: its impact on employee benefits satisfaction under flexible programs”. Benefits Quarterly, 10(4): 67-83, 1994 | |
C. Danehower, J. A. Lust. “A conceptual model of the determinants of employee benefit satisfaction”. Human Resource Management Review, 2(3): 221-238, 2001 | |
C. Danehower, J. A. Lust. “How aware are employees of their benefits?: Findings from two companies”. Benefits Quarterly, 12(4): 57-61, 1996 | |
C. Danehower, K. Celuch and J. Lust. “Benefits management and communication: A marketing orientation”. Human Resource Management Review, 4(2): 177-195, 1994 | |
E.L. Harvell, J.A. Lust. “Personalized benefit communication: An application to retirement savings plans”. Benefits Quarterly, 11(3): 56-62, 1995 | |
F. Dreher, R. Ash and R. Bretz. “Benefit coverage and employee cost: Critical factors in explaining compensation satisfaction”. Personnel Psychology, 41(2): 237-254, 1988 | |
H. Heneman III, D. Schwab. “Pay satisfaction: Its multidimensional nature and measurement”. International Journal of Psychology, 20(2): 129-141, 1985 | |
H. W. Hennessey, P.L. Perrewe and W.A. Hochwarter. “Impact of benefit awareness on employee and organizational outcomes: A longitudinal field examination”. Benefits Quarterly, 8(2): 90-98, 1992 | |
J. Haar, S. Kossack, “Employee benefit packages: How understandable are they?”. The Journal of Business Communication, 27(2): 185-200, 1990 | |
K. Aquino, R. Griffeth, D. Allen and P. Hom. “Integrating justice constructs into the turnover process: A test of a referent cognitions model”. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5): 1208-1227, 1997 | |
M. Barringer, G.Milkovich. “Employee health insurance decisions in a flexible benefits environment”. Human Resources Management Journal, 35(3): 293-316, 1996 | |
M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen. “Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour”, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. (1975) | |
M. L. Williams. “Antecedents of Employee Benefit Level Satisfaction: A Test of a Model”. Journal of Management, 21(6): 1097-1129, 1995 | |
M. Miceli, M. Lane. “Antecedents of pay satisfaction: A review and extension”. In K. Rowland and G.R. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management, 9: 235-309, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. (1991) | |
M. Tremblay, B. Sire and D. Balkin. “The role of organizational justice in pay and employee benefits satisfaction, and its effects on work attitudes”. Group and Organizational Management, 25(3): 269-290, 2000 | |
M. Williams, S. Malos and D. Palmer. “Benefit system and benefit level satisfaction: An expanded model of antecedents and consequences”. Journal of Management, 28(2): 195-21522. 2002 | |
P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y.Lee and N. P. Podsakoff. “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879-904, 2003 | |
R. Kearney, C. Sears. “Planning fringe benefits for the work force of the future”. Public Administration Quarterly, 9(3): 291-310, 1985 | |
R. M. Baron, D. A. Kenny. “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182, 1986 | |
V. Scarpello, F. Jones. “Why justice matter in compensation decision making”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17: 285-289, 1996 | |
Dr. Gery Markova
BSB, Wichita State University - United States of America
gergana.markova@wichita.edu
Dr. Foard Jones
- United States of America
|
|
|
|
View all special issues >> | |
|
|