Home > CSC-OpenAccess Library > Manuscript Information
EXPLORE PUBLICATIONS BY COUNTRIES |
EUROPE | |
MIDDLE EAST | |
ASIA | |
AFRICA | |
............................. | |
United States of America | |
United Kingdom | |
Canada | |
Australia | |
Italy | |
France | |
Brazil | |
Germany | |
Malaysia | |
Turkey | |
China | |
Taiwan | |
Japan | |
Saudi Arabia | |
Jordan | |
Egypt | |
United Arab Emirates | |
India | |
Nigeria |
A Statistical Study of Arabic Discourse Connectors in a
Diachronic Bespoke Corpus of the Years 1950 and 2018
Sarah Ajlan Alajlan
Pages - 57 - 77 | Revised - 31-10-2022 | Published - 01-12-2022
MORE INFORMATION
KEYWORDS
Arabic Newspaper Writing, Language Change, Syntax, Discourse Connectors, Diachronic Corpus, Type of Change, %DIFF Value, Effect Size.
ABSTRACT
This paper discusses changes of Arabic discourse connectors in newspaper writing by comparing two distinct time periods: 1950 and 2018. It attempts to provide an answer to the question: How has the usage of Arabic discourse connectors changed, quantitatively and qualitatively, in Arabic newspapers as evidenced in the 1950 and 2018 sub-corpora? A specialized bespoke corpus has been built specifically for this study, Leeds Bespoke Corpus of Arabic Newspaper Writings (LBCANW), that contains rare material from the year 1950 and recent material from the year 2018 (Alajlan, 2019). It is part of an ongoing PhD study that approaches the changes in the lexicon and syntax via ‘lexis’ (Sinclair, 1991). The research methodology includes: recording the frequency of occurrences; normalizing the frequencies to per million words; and calculating the percentage of change by using %DIFF value (Gabrielatos and Marchi, 2011). Discourse connectors are arranged in descending order according to %DIFF value. Discourse connectors that are found in one sub-corpora are placed in separate tables. The results show noticeable degrees of change in most of the 95 discourse connectors included in this study across the two sub-corpora 1950 and 2018. Finally, detailed linguistic discussion of the changes in five selected discourse connectors is included with concordance lines examples from the corpus using the statistical information obtained from this study.
Abdelfattah, N. M. S. (1990). Linguistic changes in journalistic language in Egypt, 1935-1989: A quantitative and comparative analysis. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin. | |
Abdul Razak, Z. R. (2011). Modern media Arabic: A study of word frequency in world affairs and sports sections in Arabic newspapers. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham. | |
Al-Hejin, B. (2012). Covering Muslim women: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of the BBC and Arab News. PhD thesis, University of Lancaster. | |
Alajlan, S. (2019). Compiling a diachronic corpus of Arabic newspaper texts: methodology and challenges. International Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL2019), 22-26 July 2019, University of Cardiff, UK. | |
Alarfaj, A. &Alsalamn, A. (2020). An efficient semantic relation extraction method for Arabic texts based on similarity measures. International Journal of Computational Linguistics (IJCL), 9(1), pp. 22-38. | |
AlfayrozĀbādī, M. (1994). القاموس المحيط. 4th ed. Heritage Investigating Office at Alresalah Publishing, Mohammed Naeem Alerqsosi (Eds). Alresalah Publishing. Beirut, Lebanon. Published in Arabic. | |
Almujaiwel, S. (2020). A comparative evaluation of POS Tagging and N-Gram measures in Arabic corpus resources and tools. International Journal of Computational Linguistics (IJCL), 11(1), pp. 1-17. | |
Alrabiah, M., Al-Salman, A., Atwell, E., and Alhelewh, N. (2014). KSUCCA: a key to exploring Arabic historical linguistics. International Journal of Computational Linguistics (IJCL), 5(2), pp. 27-36. | |
Alsaif, A. (2012). Human and automatic annotation of discourse relations for Arabic. PhD thesis, University of Leeds. | |
AlSenan, H. (2016). The change in vocabularies of freedoms and rights in Egyptian political writings from al-Ṭahṭāwī until 1952: A diachronic approach to lexical semantics. PhD thesis, University of Exeter. | |
Badawi, E., Carter, M. G., and Gully, A. (2016). Modern Written Arabic: A comprehensive grammar. London and New York: Routledge. | |
Baker, P. (2011). Times may change, but we will always have money: Diachronic variation in recent British English. Journal of English Linguistics. 39(1), pp. 65-88. | |
Bauer, L. (2002). Inferring variation and change from public corpora. In: Chambers, J.K., Trude-gill, P., and Schilling-Estes, N. eds. The handbook of language change and variations. Malden Massachusetts, USA: Blackwell Publishers Inc, pp. 95-114. | |
Brierley, C., Sawalha, M., Heselwood, B. and Atwell, E. (2016). A verified Arabic-IPA mapping for Arabic transcription technology, informed by Quranic recitation, traditional Arabic linguistics, and modern phonetics. Journal of Semitic Studies. 61(1), pp. 157-186. | |
Buerki, A. (2013). Automatically identifying instances of change in diachronic corpus data. Cor-pus Linguistics 2013, 22-26 July 2013, Lancaster University, UK. | |
Dickins, J. (2009). Clausal annexes and related phenomena in Sudanese Arabic. In Watson, J.C.E. and Retsö, J. (Eds), Genitive structures in Semitic (special publication of the Journal of Semitic Studies). Pp. 135-151. | |
Dickins, J. (2017). The pervasiveness of coordination in Arabic, with reference to Arabic>English translation. Languages in Contrast. 17(2), pp. 229-254.ISSN 1387-6759 | |
Dickins, J. (2020). Thematic structure and para-syntax: Arabic as a case Study. London and New York: Routledge. | |
Dickins, J. Hervey, S. and Higgins, I. (2017). Thinking Arabic translation: a course in translation method, Arabic to English (2ndedn.). London: Routledge. | |
Gabrielatos, C. (2007). If-conditionals as modal colligations: A corpus-based investigation. In: Davies, M., Rayson, P., Hunston, S., and P. Danielsson eds. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference: Corpus Linguistics 2007 Birmingham: University of Birming-ham, pp. 1-20. | |
Gabrielatos, C. and Marchi, A. (2011). Keyness: Matching metrics to definitions. Corpus Linguistics in the South: Theoretical-methodological challenges in corpus approaches to discourse studies - and some ways of addressing them. University of Portsmouth, 5 November 2011, pp. 1-28. | |
Gaddafi, A. (1990). Study of discourse markers in Libyan spoken Arabic. PhD thesis, University of London. | |
Hamilton, L. W., Leskovec, J., Jurafsky, D. (2016). Cultural shift or linguistic drift? Comparing two computational measures of semantic change. In: Su, J., Duh, K., Carreras, X. eds. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Pro-cessing, Austin, TX. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 2116-2121. | |
Hemeida, M. (1997). نظام الارتباط والربط في تركيب الجملة العربية. The Egyptian Int. Company for Pub, Longman, Lebanon Library, Beirut, Lebanon. Published in Arabic. | |
Hilpert, M. and Gries., S. Th. (2009). Assessing frequency changes in multistage diachronic cor-pora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 24(4), pp. 385-401. | |
Hobbs, J. R. (1985). On the coherence and structure of discourse. Tech. Report No. CSLI-85-37, Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford University. | |
Holes, C. (2004). Modern Arabic: structures, functions and varieties. London and New York: Longman. | |
Hovy, E. H. (1993). Automated discourse generation using discourse structure relations. Artificial Intelligence (Special Issue on Natural Language Processing). Elsevier, 63 (1-2), pp. 341-385. | |
Hussein, M. (2009). Relevance theory and procedural meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers in English and Arabic. PhD thesis, Newcastle University. | |
Ibn ʕabbād, A. (1994a). المحيط في اللغة. Shaikh Mohammed Hassan Al-Yaseen (Ed). Vol. 4, AlamAlkotub, Beirut, Lebanon. Published in Arabic. | |
Kalajahi, S. A. R., Abdullah, A. N., Mukundan, J., and Tannacito, D. J. (2012). Discourse connectors: An overview of the history, definition and classification of the term. World Applied Sciences Journal. 19(11): pp. 1659-1673. | |
Khalifa, I., Al Feki, Z., and Farawila, A. (2011). Arabic discourse segmentation based on rhetorical methods. International Journal of Electric & Computer Sciences. 11(1): pp. 10-15. | |
Knott, A. and Sanders, T. (1998). The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics. 30(2), pp. 135-175. | |
Mahmoud. A., (2013). A linguistic perspective of the effect of English on MSA: Manifestations and ramifications. Journal of King Saud University - Languages and Translation. 25(1), pp. 35-43. | |
Mann, W. and Thompson, S. (1986). Relational Propositions in Discourse. Discourse Processes. 9(1), pp. 57-90. | |
McEnery, T. and Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: method, theory and practice. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press. | |
Mohamed, A. (2000). A contrastive study of discourse features in English and Arabic writing in connection with two text types: research article abstracts and newspaper letters to the editor. PhD thesis, University of Exeter. | |
Sartori, M. (2019). A relational approach to modern literary Arabic conditional clauses. In: McEnery, T., Hardie, A., and Younis, N. eds. Arabic corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 143-169. | |
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | |
Tabasi, A. (2014). Effect of Arabic Language and Grammar on Persian language and Grammar. Research Journal of Recent Sciences. 3(8): pp. 125-129. | |
Mrs. Sarah Ajlan Alajlan
School of Languages, Cultures and Societies, University of Leeds, UK
College of Languages and Translation, King Saud University - Saudi Arabia
College of Languages and Translation, King Saud University - Saudi Arabia
salajlan@ksu.edu.sa
|
|
|
|
View all special issues >> | |
|
|