Home > CSC-OpenAccess Library > Manuscript Information
EXPLORE PUBLICATIONS BY COUNTRIES |
EUROPE | |
MIDDLE EAST | |
ASIA | |
AFRICA | |
............................. | |
United States of America | |
United Kingdom | |
Canada | |
Australia | |
Italy | |
France | |
Brazil | |
Germany | |
Malaysia | |
Turkey | |
China | |
Taiwan | |
Japan | |
Saudi Arabia | |
Jordan | |
Egypt | |
United Arab Emirates | |
India | |
Nigeria |
Proposed an Integrated Model to Detect The Defect in
Software Development Projects
Ayman E. Khedr, Ahmed Fouad Omran
Pages - 52 - 59 | Revised - 15-05-2012 | Published - 20-06-2012
Published in International Journal of Software Engineering (IJSE)
MORE INFORMATION
KEYWORDS
Quality Assurance, Software Inspection, Software Testing, Software Development Projects
ABSTRACT
Currently, software quality assurance does not apply completely on the development of software
industry and this leads to some challenges in the industry of software, specially, concerning cost and time consuming. While, the success of software development project depends on the application
quality assurance standards, which starts by the pre-project and continue through the project till it
reaches the user at the end. The aim of this model is the challenge to produce not only the software
development project without defects but also the customer’s acceptance and satisfaction of the
software. Thus to prevent software development project failure, this defect should be detected at an early stage.This study will deal with; the quality assurance inspection and testing, in the whole stages of software development projects. Then proposing the quality assurance inspection and testing model for the software development projects process, which known as “Integrated Model”.
Ackerman, A. F., Buchwald, L. S., and Lewsky, F. H., (1989). Software Inspections: An Effective Verification Process. IEEE Software, 6(3), pp.31-36. | |
Ashrafi, N. The impact of software process improvement on quality: In theory and practice. Information & Management, (2003), 40(7), pp.677–690. | |
Department of Computer Science University of Toronto (2001), Inspections & Reviews from http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~sme/CSC444F/slides/L09-Inspections.pdf | |
Evertsso, G. (2002). Inspection vs. Testing, Blekinge Institute of Technology Software Verification and Validation (PAD001) from http://www.guzzzt.com/files/coding/inspectionvstesting.pdf | |
GALIN, D., Software Quality Assurance: from theory to implementation, (2004), 50(1), pp.14- 34. | |
Glenford J. M., (2004). The Art of Software Testing, Second Edition, 5(21), pp.8 | |
Haughey, D., PMP, project smart (2000-2011), Why software projects fail and how to make them succeed, 1-2 | |
Heusser, M., An ounce of prevention. Better Software, 3, 48, (2004). | |
John E. Bentley, Software Testing Fundamentals—Concepts, Roles, and Terminology, Wachovia Bank, Charlotte NC, pp. 141 – 30. | |
Jorge Dominguez, The Curious Case of the CHAOS Report (2009), Project Smart, 2009 | |
Senyard A., and Michlmayr M.(2004). How to Have a Successful Free Software Project, from http://www.cyrius.com/publications/senyard_michlmayr-successful_project.pdf | |
Suzuki, T., (2011), Quality Improvement by the Real-Time Detection of the Problems, 15: 1- 6 | |
Types of software Testing, from http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/types-of-software-testing/ | |
Zrie, M., (2010), Software Project plan Structure, from http://www.zriel.com/lamp/49-software-project-plan-structure | |
Dr. Ayman E. Khedr
- Egypt
Mr. Ahmed Fouad Omran
Faisal Islamic Bank, Egypt - Egypt
ahmed_fouad2025@yahoo.com
|
|
|
|
View all special issues >> | |
|
|