Home > CSC-OpenAccess Library > Manuscript Information
EXPLORE PUBLICATIONS BY COUNTRIES |
EUROPE | |
MIDDLE EAST | |
ASIA | |
AFRICA | |
............................. | |
United States of America | |
United Kingdom | |
Canada | |
Australia | |
Italy | |
France | |
Brazil | |
Germany | |
Malaysia | |
Turkey | |
China | |
Taiwan | |
Japan | |
Saudi Arabia | |
Jordan | |
Egypt | |
United Arab Emirates | |
India | |
Nigeria |
Social Responsibility and Social Innovation - Contributions from a Portuguese Law Firm
Ana Sofia Firmino
Pages - 36 - 63 | Revised - 11-09-2021 | Published - 15-06-2022
Published in Social Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Finance: Theory and Practice in Challenging Times (SIBRM9)
MORE INFORMATION
KEYWORDS
Corporate Social Responsibility, Law Firm, Social Innovation, Vieira de Almeida Law Firm, Social Demands.
ABSTRACT
The present study aims to analyze how a big law firm – in this case, Vieira de Almeida Law Firm
(based in Portugal) – can adjust and accommodate general framework regarding social
responsibility and social innovation to meet specific responsibilities (and needs) of lawyers.
It will be highlighted how this law firm has developed, especially in the last two decades, a solid program of social responsibility – with special focus on pro bono legal assistance, citizenship education, third sector capacity building, corporate volunteering, internal campaigns and environmental sustainability – and how it encouraged the promotion of social innovation actions, aligning different interests and agents and contributing for the development and dissemination of this area (for example, through the support of nonprofit civil society organizations).
Vieira de Almeida Law Firm (VdA) was chosen as a leading example in the Portuguese market of big law firms, since it supports a different approach on how lawyers can (and should) act when practicing law; appealing for a practice with purpose, in line with the values that are recognized by this law firm to be at the core of Justice.
Through the present study, we expect to enrich research on corporate social responsibility and social innovation regarding specifically law firms and contribute for the future development of studies in this area by the International Journal of Business Research and Management, promoting investigation that has not been particularly explored previously.
The Special Issue in which the present study is published – dedicated to “Social Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Finance: Theory and Practice in Challenging Times” – constitutes an opportunity to reveal how social responsibility and social innovation can be an important contribution to face new challenges, caused, for example, by pandemic times.
It will be highlighted how this law firm has developed, especially in the last two decades, a solid program of social responsibility – with special focus on pro bono legal assistance, citizenship education, third sector capacity building, corporate volunteering, internal campaigns and environmental sustainability – and how it encouraged the promotion of social innovation actions, aligning different interests and agents and contributing for the development and dissemination of this area (for example, through the support of nonprofit civil society organizations).
Vieira de Almeida Law Firm (VdA) was chosen as a leading example in the Portuguese market of big law firms, since it supports a different approach on how lawyers can (and should) act when practicing law; appealing for a practice with purpose, in line with the values that are recognized by this law firm to be at the core of Justice.
Through the present study, we expect to enrich research on corporate social responsibility and social innovation regarding specifically law firms and contribute for the future development of studies in this area by the International Journal of Business Research and Management, promoting investigation that has not been particularly explored previously.
The Special Issue in which the present study is published – dedicated to “Social Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Finance: Theory and Practice in Challenging Times” – constitutes an opportunity to reveal how social responsibility and social innovation can be an important contribution to face new challenges, caused, for example, by pandemic times.
Agudelo, M., Jóhannsdóttir, L. and Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A Literature Review of the History and Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. 4(1), 2-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y. | |
Branco, M. and Rodrigues, L. (2008). Factors Influencing Social Responsibility Disclosure by Portuguese Companies. Journal of Business Ethic. 83, 685-701. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25482407. | |
Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social Innovation: Moving the Field Forward. A Conceptual Framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 82(C), 42-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008. | |
Carroll, A.B. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility: Perspectives on the CSR Construct’s Development and Future. Business & Society. 60(6), 1258-1278. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00076503211001765. | |
European Commission (2020). Social Enterprises and their Ecosystems in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=8274. | |
Farrow, T. (2008). Sustainable Professionalism. German Law Journal. 10, 1001-1046. 10.1017/S2071832200001462. | |
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman. | |
Garriga, E. and Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics. 53(1-2), 51-71. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34. | |
González-Ramos, M., Donate M. and Guadamillas, F. (2014). Technological Posture and Corporate Social Responsibility: Effects on Innovation Performance. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. 13, 2497-2505. 10.30638/eemj.2014.279. | |
Gutterman, A., Walter, A, Miller, T., Cassidy, M. (2019). The Lawyer’s Corporate Social Responsibility Deskbook: Practical Guidance for Corporate Counsel and Law Firms. American Bar Association. | |
Halkos, G. and Skouloudis, A. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovative Capacity: Intersection in a Macrolevel Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production. 182, pp. 291-300. http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/75508/. | |
Howaldt, J. and Schwarz, M. (2010). Social Innovation: Concepts, Research Fields and International Trends. Studies for Innovation in a Modern Working Environment - International Monitoring. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/5420652/social-innovation-conceptsresearch-fields-and-international-trends | |
Hutchinson, A. (2006). Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Irwin Law, https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/faculty_books/103. | |
Kalkanci, B., M. Rahmani, Toktay, L. (2018). The Role of Inclusive Innovation in Promoting Social Sustainability. SSRN Electronic Journal. 28(12), 2960-2982. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13112. | |
Mulgan, G. (2006). The Process of Social Innovations. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 1(2), 145–162. htpp://direct.mit.edu/itgg/articlepdf/1/2/145/704243/itgg.2006.1.2.145.pdf. | |
Mulgan, G. and Tucker, S., Ali, R. and Sanders, B. (2007). Social Innovation: What it is, Why it Matters And How It Can Be Accelerated. https://www.youngfoundation.org/publications/socialinnovation-what-it-is-why-it-matters-how-it-can-be-accelerated/. | |
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. and Mulgan, G. (2010). The Open Book of Social Innovation. https://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/The-Open-Book-of-Social-Innovationg.pdf. | |
Phills Jr., A.J., Deiglmeir K. and Miler, D.T. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovations Review. 6(4), 34-43, https://ssir.org/articles/entry/rediscovering_social_innovation. | |
Rexhepia, G., Kurtishib, S. and Bexheti, G. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Innovation The Drivers of Business Growth?. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 75, 532-541. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813005946. | |
Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Harper & Brothers. | |
Seck, S., Devlin, R. and Quigg, S.. (2021). Soft Law, Legal Ethics and the Corporate Lawyer: Confronting Human Rights and Sustainability Norms. Legal Ethics. 24(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2021.1979729. | |
Spiesshofer, B. (2021). Be Careful What You Wish For: A European Perspective on the Limits of CSR in the Legal Profession. Legal Ethics. 24(1), 73-88, https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2021.1979732. | |
Tracey, P. and Stott, N. (2017). Social Innovation: A Window on Alternative Ways of Organizing and Innovating. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice. 19(1), 51-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1268924. | |
Wan-Jan, W.S. (2006). Defining Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Public Affairs. 6(3-4), 176-184. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229578267_Defining_corporate_social_responsibility. | |
Westley, F. and Antadze, N. (2010). Making a Difference: Strategies for Scaling Social Innovation for Greater Impact. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal. 15(2), 1-19. https://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/2010_15_2_2_westley-antadze_social-innovate.pdf. | |
Whelan, C., and Ziv, N. (2012). Law Firm Ethics in the Shadow of Corporate Social Responsibility. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Forthcoming. 63, 1-30. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2164615. | |
Xuan, L.T.T. Xuan and Teal, G. (2011). A Review of the Development in Defining Corporate Social Responsibility. Science and Technology Development Journal. 14, 106-115. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340268942_A_REVIEW_OF_THE_DEVELOPMENT_IN_DEFINING_CORPORATE_SOCIAL_RESPONSIBILITY. | |
Mrs. Ana Sofia Firmino
Legal Adviser, Lisbon, 1200 - Portugal
anafirmino@hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
View all special issues >> | |
|
|