Home   >   CSC-OpenAccess Library   >    Manuscript Information
Validating Complexity Metrics for Laravel Software
Kevin Agina Onyango, Geoffrey Muchiri Muketha, John Gichuki Ndia
Pages - 26 - 45     |    Revised - 28-02-2025     |    Published - 01-04-2025
Volume - 12   Issue - 2    |    Publication Date - April 2025  Table of Contents
MORE INFORMATION
KEYWORDS
Empirical Study, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Complexity Metrics, Modifiability, Laravel Software, MVC Design Pattern.
ABSTRACT
The increasing complexity of Laravel software poses significant challenges to modifiability, necessitating the definition ofmetrics to assess and controlcomplexity. There exist metrics to measure Laravel complexity, however, they have not been validated empirically. This study, therefore, presents two validation studies, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework and a controlled laboratory experiment to empirically validate selected Laravel complexity metrics. The AHP framework and Controlled laboratory experiment were used to empirically validate the metrics. A within-subject experimental design was used where 10 real-world Laravel projects from GitHub were presented to 52 subjects. The subjects gave their opinion on the Modifiability and Time to Modify the Laravel projects. Regression and correlation tests were employed for the analysis of the data collected. The correlation test results indicated that ata 99% confidence level, all the metrics gave a negative correlation with the subjects' rating on the Modifiability and a positive significant correlation with the subjects’ Time to Modify the Laravel projects. Regression analysis further validated the metrics' predictive capability. The regression results gave an R square value of 0.893 for CCMLV metric, 0.993 for MCMLV and 0.594 for VCMLV metric with a Pvalue of < 0.05 for the subjects ranking on the Modifiability and an R square value of 0.823 for CCMLV metric, 0.831 for MCMLV and 0.856 for VCMLV with all giving a P-value of < 0.001 for the subjects’ time to modify the Laravel projects. Consequently, AHP results indicated that the metrics were reliable with an acceptable Consistency Ratio (CR) of 0.0464, the result results further showed that CCMLV contributes the highest to the complexity of Laravel software at 65.83%, VCMLV is the second highest contributor at 28.19 % while the least contributing metric is the MCMLV at only 5.98%.
Adam, S. I., & Andolo, S. (2019, August 1).A New PHP Web Application Development Framework Based on MVC Architectural Pattern and Ajax Technology. IEEE Xplore.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORIS.2019.8874912.
Anon.(2024). Software complexity. CAST Software. Retrieved from https://www.castsoftware.com/glossary/software-complexity. (Accessed March. 2, 2025).
Barón, M. M., Wyrich, M., & Wagner, S. (2022). An empirical validation of cognitive complexity as a measure of source code understandability. Frontiers in Neuroscience.
Brotherton, C. (2020, September 29; Updated December 14, 2023). The most popular PHP frameworks to use in 2021. Kinsta. Retrieved from https://kinsta.com/blog/php-frameworks/ (Accessed March. 2, 2025).
Chidamber, S. R., & Kemerer, C. F. (1994). A metrics suite for object-oriented design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(6), 476-493.
Dockins, K. (2024). Design patterns with PHP and Laravel. Retrieved from http://samples.leanpub.com/larasign-sample.pdf.
Elsevier. (2022, November 17). Why is data validation important in research? | Author Services Blog. Elsevier Author Services. Retrieved from https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/research-process/why-is-data-validation-important-in-research/.
Eraso, D. A. A. (2017). A framework for evaluating maintainability and performance of object-relational-mapping tools in web application frameworks. National University of Colombia, Colombia. Retrieved from https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/handle/unal/59316/1087411095.2017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Estdale, J., & Georgiadou, E. (2018). Applying the ISO/IEC 25010 quality models to software products. In Systems, software and services process improvement: 25th European Conference,EuroSPI 2018, Bilbao, Spain, September 5-7, 2018, Proceedings (pp. 492-503). Springer International Publishing.
Falessi, D., Juristo, N., Wohlin, C., Turhan, B., Münch, J., Jedlitschka, A., & Oivo, M. (2018). Empirical software engineering experts on the use of students and professionals in experiments. Empirical Software Engineering, 23(1), 452–489.
Griffin, J., & Griffin, J. (2021). Introduction to Laravel. Domain-Driven Laravel: Learn to Implement Domain-Driven Design Using Laravel, 97-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-6023-4_4.
Halstead, M. H. (1977). Elements of software science. Elsevier North-Holland, Inc.
Jang, Y. (2020, April 28). Survey data: Reliability and validity? Are they interchangeable? Explorance. Retrieved from https://explorance.com/blog/survey-data-reliability-and-validity-are-they-interchangeable/.
Kaur, B., & Bhatia, R. (2015). Prioritizing parameters for software project selection using analytical hierarchical process. International Journal of Computer Applications, 118(3), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.5120/20729-3088.
King’ori, A. W., Muketha G, M., & Muthoni E, M. (2022). Complexity Metrics for State chart Diagrams. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, 13(3), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2022.13305.
King’ori, A. W., Muketha, G. M., & Ndia, J. G. (2024). A Framework for Analyzing UML Behavioral Metrics based on Complexity Perspectives. International Journal of Software Engineering (IJSE). https://www.cscjournals.org/library/manuscriptinfo.php?mc=IJSE-187.
Kothari, C. R., & Garg, G. (2014). Research methodology (3rd ed.). New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.
Kuflewski, K., & Dzieńkowski, M. (2021). Symfony and Laravel – a comparative analysis of PHP programming frameworks.Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 21, 367–372. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2749.
Laravel Book. (2016, October 26). Laravel introduction. Retrieved from http://laravelbook.com/laravelintroduction/.
Laravel.com. (n.d.). Laravel - The PHP framework for web artisans. Retrieved from https://laravel.com/docs/10.x/eloquent.
Latanska, l., Makarova, l., Koltsov, A., & Davlatova, D. (2022). A Nonlinear Regression Model for Estimating the Size of Web Applications Created Using Symfony Framework. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Technical Sciences, 315(6(1)), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5732-2022-315-6-119-124.
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical research: Planning and design (11th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
Liawatimena, S., Warnars, H. L. H. S., Trisetyarso, A., Abdurahman, E., Soewito, B., Wibowo, A. & Abbas, B. S. (2018, September). Django web framework software metrics measurement using radon and pylint. In 2018 Indonesian Association for Pattern Recognition International Conference (INAPR) (pp. 218-222). IEEE.
Masmali, O., Badreddin, O., & Khandoker, R. (2021). Metrics to measure code complexity based on software design: Practical evaluation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73103-8_9.
McCabe, T. J. (1976). A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-2(4), 308-320.
Mens, T. (2016). Research trends in structural software complexity. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1608.01533.
Misra, S., Akman, I., & Colomo-Palacios, R. (2012). Framework for evaluation and validation of software complexity measures. IET Software, 6(4), 323. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-sen.2011.0206.
Muketha, G. M., Abd Ghani, A. A., & Atan, R. (2020). Validating structural metrics for BPEL process models. Journal of Web Engineering. https://doi.org/10.13052/jwe1540-9589.19566.
Mukunga, C. W., Ndia, J. G., & Wambugu, G. M. (2022). Factors affecting software maintenance cost of Python programs. International Journal of Software Engineering (IJSE).https://www.cscjournals.org/library/manuscriptinfo.php?mc=IJSE-185.
Mukunga, C. W., Ndia, J. G., & Wambugu, G. M. (2023). A METRICS -BASED MODEL FOR ESTIMATING THE MAINTENANCE EFFORT OF PYTHON SOFTWARE. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, 14(3), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2023.14302.
Ndia, J. G. (2019). Structural Complexity Framework and Metrics for Analyzing the Maintainability of Sassy Cascading Style Sheets (Doctoral dissertation, MMUST).
Onyango, K. A., Muketha, G. M., & Micheni, E. M. (2020). A metrics based fuzzy logic model for predicting the reusability of object oriented software. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9(6), 536–546. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.f1627.089620.
Onyango, K. A., Muketha, G. M., & Ndia, J. G. (2024). Structural complexity metrics for Laravel software. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), 15(4). https://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2024.15404.
Peterka, P. (2024, April 15). Comprehensive guide to analytic hierarchy process (AHP): Make effective decisions. SixSigma.us. Retrieved from www.6sigma.us/six-sigma-in-focus/analytic-hierarchy-process-ahp/.
Real Statistics. (n.d.). Cronbach’s alpha basic concepts. Real Statistics Using Excel. Retrieved fromhttps://real-statistics.com/reliability/internal-consistency-reliability/cronbachs-alpha/cronbachs-alpha-basic-concepts/.
ResearchGate. (2024). Laravel: A framework for building PHP apps. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347441179_Laravel_A_framework_for_building_PHP_Apps.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill.
Salman, I., Misirli, A. T., & Juristo, N. (2015, May). Are students’ representatives of professionals in software engineering experiments? In 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (Vol. 1, pp. 666–676). IEEE.
Sergiy Prykhodko, Shutko, I., & Andrii Prykhodko. (2022). Early size estimation of web apps created using codeigniter framework by nonlinear regression models. RADIOELECTRONIC and COMPUTER SYSTEMS, 3, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2022.3.06.
Setiyawan, R., et al. (2020). Evaluation of PHP framework measured using object-oriented metrics with the analytic hierarchy process. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 874(1), 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/874/1/012025.
Shrove, M. T., & Jovanov, E. (2020). Empirical Study of Software Development Life Cycle and its Various Models. International Journal of Software Engineering (IJSE). https://www.cscjournals.org/library/manuscriptinfo.php?mc=IJSE-169.
Soni, D., Shrivastava, R., & Kumar, M. (2009). A framework for validation of object-oriented design metrics. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), 6(3). Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1001/1001.1970.pdf.
Tenzin, S. (2022). PHP framework for web application development. International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.17148/iarjset.2022.9218.
W3Techs. (2020). Usage statistics and market share of server-side programming languages for websites, January 2020. Retrieved from https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/programming_language. (Accessed March. 2, 2025).
Zhang, H., & Babar, M. A. (2011). On the complexity of Laravel application models: A framework-specific metrics analysis. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Software Quality and Maintainability.
Mr. Kevin Agina Onyango
Department of Information Technology, Murang’a University of Technology, Murang’a - Kenya
konyango@mut.ac.ke
Mr. Geoffrey Muchiri Muketha
Department of Computer Science, Murang’a University of Technology, Murang’a - Kenya
Mr. John Gichuki Ndia
Department of Information Technology, Murang’a University of Technology, Murang’a - Kenya


CREATE AUTHOR ACCOUNT
 
LAUNCH YOUR SPECIAL ISSUE
View all special issues >>
 
PUBLICATION VIDEOS